The Melvin Gordon Holdout is One with Little Leverage

Melvin Gordon Holdout Chargers

Where have you heard this before? The NFL has a star running back sitting out training camp until he gets paid. In fact, two prominent running backs are holding out: Ezekiel Elliott of the Dallas Cowboys and Melvin Gordon of the Los Angeles Chargers. After a close review of situations, it’s clear that in the case of the Melvin Gordon holdout, he has little to no leverage.

Melvin Gordon is a Great NFL Running Back

Before getting to Melvin Gordon’s holdout, let’s talk numbers. Important to note is that Gordon had his best season in 2018, a performance earning him the number 34 spot on the NFL’s annual Top 100 list. In just 12 games, Melvin Gordon rushed for 885 yards, 5.1 yards-per-carry, and 10 touchdowns. Of note, this was his first season with a yards-per-carry above 3.9. In addition, he racked up 50 receptions for 490 yards and 4 more touchdowns.

14 touchdowns are nothing to dismiss, especially considering how the first-round back started his career. After missing the pay-dirt in his rookie season, Gordon amassed 38 touchdowns in his next three seasons. For many (Gordon himself included), it’s difficult to ignore that production.

Melvin Gordon Chargers Holdout

Efficiency wise, Gordon was also the highest-graded running back against stacked boxes, per PFF. PFF also ranked him 3rd overall for running backs in 2018 and 11th in PFF’s wins above replacement. Additionally, Melvin Gordon posted a staggering number of top efficiency stats on Player Profiler. His plus-34.6 (No.4 ) Production Premium, 34-percent (No. 5) Dominator Rating, 79 (No. 6) Evaded Tackles, 35.1-percent (No. 5) Juke Rate and 2.07 (No. 3) Yards Created Per Carry are elite.

As a player, Gordon has the ability to run inside, outside and is an effective receiver. He was good to great in most areas of production and efficiency in 2018. By most measures of production and efficiency in 2018, Gordon was at the top. It makes sense he would try and renegotiate his contract. He feels elite and wants to be paid as such.

Running Backs are Devalued. Sorry Melvin Gordon Holdout

Unfortunately for Melvin Gordon, he is a running back in the NFL. While running backs are the most important position in fantasy football, they aren’t as valuable to actual football teams. Let’s dissect this (If you would like to continue learning more about running back devaluation and replaceability, read in-depth analysis from PFF, Josh Hermsmeyer, JJ Zachariason, and Ben Baldwin).

Running Backs are Replaceable

Before injury in 2018, Todd Gurley was playing at another level. He had all the production to qualify his elite talent. Gurley was the bell-cow back that everyone loves, rushing for 98 yards and 1.25 rushing touchdowns per game in his first 12 games. Adding to that, Gurley had 3.83 receptions per game for 39.5 yards and 0.33 receiving touchdowns in that span. He was, by all means, an excellent form of offensive production before his injury slowed him down in December.

With that said, C.J. Anderson (a backup running back CUT by the Panthers after Week 9) replaced the injured Gurley and also played on an elite level. Prior to exploding with the Rams, Anderson had just 24 carries for 104 yards and 1 reception in 9 games with the Panthers. In his first three games with the Rams, Anderson rushed for 422 yards and 4 touchdowns.

A similar situation occurred in Kansas City. After Kareem Hunt was cut by the Kansas City Chiefs, Damien Williams produced at a level similar to Hunt. Neither the Rams nor the Chiefs offenses halted. In fact, the Chiefs made it to the AFC Championship and the Rams made it to the Super Bowl.

As PFF’s Steve Palazzolo and Sam Monson point out, running backs are highly dependent on surrounding talent, offensive line, game script and offensive scheme. Unlike throwing in a backup quarterback, throwing a backup running back into a high-octane offense is almost seamless. After all, the Chargers had 4 wins and 0 losses without Melvin Gordon in 2018.

The Chargers have Two Quality Backup Running Backs

Austin Ekeler

Alongside Melvin Gordon, Austin Ekeler was an excellent complementary back. They were quite the one-two punch in 2018. Ekeler, while not as efficient or productive as Gordon, still posted a plus-25.9 (No 8) Production Premium, 4.9 (No. 8) True Yards Per Carry, 6.6 (No. 4) Yards Per Touch and a 9.4-percent (No. 1) Breakaway Run Rate. Ekeler, though he began his career undrafted, made a name for himself in the Chargers backfield. Because of both his talent and the replaceability of running backs, Austin Gayle believes that Ekeler can replace Gordon’s production in the case of a holdout. 

Justin Jackson – Razzle Dazzle

Behind Ekeler, the Chargers also have sophomore running back Justin Jackson. 

Aside from having a tremendous College Profile, Jackson also has that ‘razzle dazzle’.

“He’s a creative runner,” backfield mate Austin Ekeler said. “He’s a unique runner. There aren’t many people I’ve seen, in general, that run like he does. Like I tell him, he’s got that razzle-dazzle, some hocus-pocus [laughs] — I make up all these different things. That’s how he runs, and that’s how I’d describe his runs because you really don’t know what he’s going to do.”

Austin Ekeler

Running Back Decline, Injury Risk and the Melvin Gordon Holdout

The Age of Decline

According to both Pro Football Reference and Mike Taglier of Fantasy Pros, the average age of running back decline is at 28 years of age. Well, Melvin Gordon is entering his age-26 season. He’s only two years away from  If he holds out in 2019, he’s only one year away from the dreaded age-28 season. Why pay up for a running back just before his decline?

Injury Risk

Everyone would agree that football is a vicious sport. After all, the average NFL career only lasts 3.3 years. But, out of every position in football, none is riskier than running back. Running backs have the shortest careers, averaging only 2.57 years in the NFL. Due to the nature of the position and the number of regular collisions, it makes sense. This is another reason why many NFL teams avoid paying large contracts to aging running backs. 

Moreover, Melvin Gordon is not a picture of perfect health.

Melvin Gordon Injury Report

Gordon also accrued 1,079 touches in his four-year career. Because of injury risk and inevitable decline, it’s often easier for teams to just draft another running back than pay the current producer.

Teams Don’t Stop Everything for Running Backs

“I don’t find that happening any time soon. If his own team isn’t going to pay him, I don’t think there are other teams out there who will pay him what he’s looking for,” Quinn said. “I don’t see many teams knocking down the door to offer long-term extensions to running backs anymore.”

Brady Quinn

According to Over the Cap, teams spend just 3.33-percent of their overall cap towards running backs. That doesn’t mean that they spend 3.33-percent for their best running back, but all running backs combined. As noted in the paragraphs above, the running back position is replaceable in production and a constant flow of talent entering the draft. Teams opt to run their back to the ground and then just get another. Or, many teams like the New England Patriots and Philadelphia Eagles deploy a committee of specialist running backs at value. 

Another reason that running backs don’t earn as much money is that the running back position is analytically worth less than other positions. Without getting too much into it, passing is simply more efficient and valuable than rushing. That’s why a 5-yard rush is considered good, while a 5-yard pass isn’t. To paraphrase a common analytical stance, the running back position is closer to punter in value than it is to quarterback. Instead of running backs setting up the pass, there’s more evidence that the pass sets up the run. Establishing the run has become more of a trope than a definitive. Because of this, analytics has popularized the phrase “running backs don’t matter.” While this is hyperbole, the statistical impact a running back has on a football field is smaller than many think.

If you want to read about this, read these articles by Josh Hermsmeyer, JJ Zachariason, or Ben Baldwin.

For A Passing League, The NFL Still Doesn’t Pass Enough

Even Ezekiel Elliott isn’t worth the money according to Josh Hermsmeyer of FiveThirtyEight. And behind Saquon Barkley, Ezekiel Elliott is regarded as the second-best running back in the league. So if Zeke doesn’t deserve it, then Gordon’s value also takes a hit. 

Fans, Quarterback and a Franchise Tag

Unfortunately for Melvin Gordon, he doesn’t have the fans and team completely behind him. In a fan poll on Bolts From the Blue, about 70-percent of respondents would rather trade Gordon away, while 8-percent voted to let Gordon sit out without pay. The fans certainly don’t have his back.

Also painful for Gordon is that Philip Rivers came out and said the Chargers would be fine without Gordon. Ouch.

Last, the Chargers hold the best cards in the case of a holdout. Let’s say that the Melvin Gordon holdout leads to him sitting the entire 2019 season. If he does this, he is subject to fines ($40,000 for each day of training camp) and loss of game checks. But worst of all, he doesn’t accrue his fifth-year with the Chargers and he is still under contract for 2020. Essentially, Gordon would just push his 5th-year option forward a year. So he gets another year older without anything changing. Then, if he accrues that fifth season by playing all or part of the 2020 season, the Chargers can just franchise tag him for 2021. They have all the leverage.

Conclusion

Us at the Unafraid Show are all for players getting paid. We’ve written extensively about it. See the articles below.

https://unafraidshow.com/ussf-uswnt-makes-more-than-usmnt/
https://unafraidshow.com/why-is-paying-college-athletes-viewed-so-negatively-by-some-fans/
https://unafraidshow.com/nba-superstars-underpaid/

However, this article is about leverage and Melvin Gordon simply doesn’t have as much leverage as he thinks he does with this holdout. That’s because running backs are in a horrible cycle for sports. Draft them, run them to the ground and then dump them. Teams don’t need to pay up for them. Are there running backs that are more talented than others? Completely. Can an elite running back give a team an edge over other teams in different situations? Of course.

But, with the amount of talent available for drafts, teams can draft a player and own his rights for his five, best years. If running backs want to get paid, they need to change the NFL CBA. Instead of four-year contracts with a fifth-year option, perhaps it would benefit running backs more if they were drafted to two-year contracts with a third-year option. That would allow running backs to earn second contracts before their best years are behind them. So, instead of holding out for pay for himself, Melvin Gordon holdout should be advocating for change for the players yet to enter the draft.

USWNT Makes More than USMNT? US Soccer Claims Unfair Pay to Men

USWNT Makes More Than USMNT USSF says so

Clay Travis Thinks the USWNT Makes More than USMNT

When the opening lines of an article about a compelling topic use the words “victims”, “facts”, “feelings” and “the good fight”, it falls flat. This is exactly what sparked the discussion about the USWNT and USMNT pay.

I know we live in an era when everyone wants to be a victim and facts don’t matter, but notwithstanding this sad trend I continue to fight the good fight and bring you facts instead of feelings.

Clay Travis, OKTC

I know, I know, it’s sexist of me to actually share facts that contradict a victimization narrative in 2019. How dare I?

Clay Travis, OKTC

Good lord, the men are getting screwed here.

Clay Travis, OKTC

Now, aside from some cringe-worthy quotes, Clay Travis actually believes that there is a pay gap in soccer. He does admit that things are unfair. But, Travis believes that it is unfair to the men. He thinks that the USWNT makes more than the USMNT. Additionally, Travis claims that the US Women earn more money without producing as much revenue.

Now, it’s tough to blame Clay Travis when he got all of his “facts” from US Soccer.

Now these are, importantly, all the funds provided by US soccer.

Clay Travis, OKTC

As seen above, Travis got all of his facts from a single source. One source. And on top of that, all of it came from US Soccer. That is baffling. Especially for a journalist. Everyone, no matter whether they are a journalist, lawyer or regular Joe/Jane, should learn from this. It is necessary to view facts and arguments from both sides of an argument. Ignoring the opposition in order to defend morality and non-sexism is ultimately how sexism continues to perpetuate society.

Remember, Facts are Complicated and Can Be Spun in Both Directions

https://youtu.be/qN7HzpF1G3Q
Are fans misguided in their equal pay chants?

Those arguing against paying women equally are quick to argue:

  • Women earn a higher percentage of prize money than men in World Cups
  • USWNT have benefits like health insurance, sick leave and 401k’s that men don’t
  • US Soccer said that the women earned more, while producing less
  • It’s all about revenue. Women’s sports don’t create as much revenue
  • The women agreed to their collective bargaining agreement and should stop complaining

But, as noted in a previous Unafraid Show article, it’s much more complicated than that. A deeper dive is needed into the role of revenue, sponsors, and pay.

“That’s something never really analyzed.” “What is the potential value of the Women’s World Cup? Nobody knows the Women’s World Cup commercial value because it’s not sold separately. This is something that should at least be discussed.”Tatiana Haenni, former FIFA head of women’s soccer

Tatiana Haenni, former FIFA head of women’s soccer

The former head of FIFA women’s soccer says that the financials are not clearly separated. So, because of this FIFA revenue isn’t black and white. More financials are needed, but they’re not readily available to the public.

Facts from US Soccer’s Carlos Cordeiro

In addition, the numbers provided by US Soccer’s President Carlos Cordeiro and cited by Clay Travis are strictly from 2010-2018. Why not give a larger or smaller data set? Why these years? Perhaps to fit a narrative.

Cordeiro states that the USWNT made more than the USMNT from 2010 to 2018. In particular, they said that the USWNT earned $34.1 million in salaries and bonuses, which is nearly $8 million more than the men’s $26.4 million. He continued by arguing that the USWNT only produced $101.3 million, compared to the USMNT’s $185.7 million. Is this a true fact? Well, yes and no.

Differences in Pay Structures and Performance

First off, this calculation includes NWSL salaries. Currently, US Soccer pays for club salaries of USWNT players. Unlike their counterparts, male players are strictly on a “pay-for-play” structure. While the USWNT argues that this should not be counted, it is definitely an inclusion by those against them. Additionally, these numbers ignore how dominant the women have been.

From 2010 to 2018, here are their compared numbers:

  • USWNT: 190 games, 151 wins, 18 losses, 21 draws, 79-percent win rate
  • USMNT: 151 games, 77 wins, 44 losses, 30 draws, 51-percent win rate

This also ignores the fact that the men MISSED out on the 2018 World Cup. That alone would have raised their pay significantly. So, the USWNT make more than the USWMT? Kind of. Yes, according to the US Soccer figures, they made more than the men from 2010 to 2018. But, they also played more games and earned more bonuses from wins. The USWNT played in 13 World Cup matches during that time, winning 12 and drawing 1. Contrastly, the men played in 8, winning two, losing three and drawing three. So, of course, they should have made more. However, they shouldn’t have to be the best team in the world for a decade just to edge out a middling-national team (USMNT).

Remain Skeptical

Also, remember these numbers are also handpicked by US Soccer and President Cordeiro. Why 2010 to 2018? What about 2014 to July of 2019? Why not include the USWNT’s back to back World Cup cycles? When looking at the three years following the 2015 World Cup win, the women’s team produced a net of $27,544,953, compared to $3,130,980. Additionally, recall that the USWNT broke a flurry of records and proved themselves in both viewership and revenue. Since the 2015 World Cup win, the USWNT is producing more total revenue than the USMNT. Their home kit also became Nike’s best online-selling jersey in a single season. On top of that, according to Fanatics, the 2019 women’s team is the top-selling national soccer team, men or women. With all that said, it appears that Corderio’s numbers are hand-picked.

Remember, heavy skepticism should be placed in lawsuit facts and figures.

Apples to Apples

Also, all of these numbers ignore the simplest ones. When games are compared apples to apples, the men make drastically more than the women. Comparing the two structures as-is is not the point because of the different pay structures. The USWNT has a base salary, while the men are paid for matches and performance.

“The USSF fact sheet is not a ‘clarification.’ It is a ruse. Here is what they cannot deny. For every game a man plays on the MNT he makes a higher base salary payment than a woman on the WNT. For every comparable win or tie, his bonus is higher. That is the very definition of gender discrimination. For the USSF to believe otherwise, is disheartening but it only increases our determination to obtain true equal pay.”

Molly Levinson, USWNT Spokeswoman

Because of the differences in their pay structures, it’s difficult to clearly assess. Of note, the USWNT are vying for equal pay structures. Men earn considerably higher roster and game bonuses when compared to women. Do the USWNT make more than the USMNT on a per-game basis? No, and that’s what they want. They desire a CBA that is consistent with the men.

Do the women get different benefits that the men don’t. Yes. And that can’t be ignored either. Unlike the men, the USWNT earn year-long salaries and have their club (NWSL) salaries paid by US Soccer. This is true. They also receive health benefits that the USMNT does not. And, if the US Soccer reports are true, the USWNT make more than the USMNT on a macro scale. All of these need to be considered when weighing the arguments of equal pay.

USWNT Had to Be the Best to Out-Earn USMNT

https://unafraidshow.com/12-uswnt-stats-womens-soccer-america-is-the-best/

However, it is very important to remember that the USWNT was (and still is) the best women’s national team in the world for the better part of a decade. Out-earning the men is most likely due to wins and bonus money. For goodness sake, from 2010-2018, the USWNT won match after match and lifted trophy after trophy:

  • World Cup Champions: 2015
  • World Cup Runner-Up: 2011
  • Olympic Games Gold: 2012
  • CONCACAF Championship and Gold Cup Champions: 2014, 2018
  • CONCACAF Championship and Gold Cup: 2010
  • CONCACAF Women’s Olympic Qualifying Tournament Champions: 2012, 2016
  • Algarve Cup Champions: 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015
  • Four Nations Tournament Champions: 2011
  • SheBelieves Cup Champions: 2016, 2018
  • Tournament of Nations Champions: 2018

Unlike the USMNT from 2010 to 2018, the women were incredible. With their 2019 World Cup repeat, they continue to display excellence. So, it would make sense that the best team in the world for a decade would out-earn their middling cousin. They earned bonuses and prize money that the men couldn’t. Again, that is all on a macro scale, displayed only through the sample-set of data given by US Soccer.

Equal Investment and Equal Care for USWNT and USMNT

But, as Megan Rapinoe stated, it’s about more than just looking at compensation.

In a broad sense, it’s about equal investment and equal care of both the men’s and women’s sides. Whether it’s youth team programs, marketing, the branding of the team, how they sell tickets, what they spend advertising money on, what they pay each side, what they spend on support staff, what they spend on coaching, what’s the travel budget — it’s all of that. The compensation is sort of the last big part.

Megan Rapinoe

That’s what the USWNT want. Equal pay doesn’t mean that the women can out-earn the men IF they are the number-one team in the world for a decade. Instead, equal pay would mean that the women and men would have the same structure in addition to, as Rapinoe states, equal care and investment.

As this lawsuit continues to develop and as more information comes out, remember to skeptically view the facts and figures from both sides.

Novak Djokovic Wins Wimbledon Final and Joins GOAT Conversation

Novak Djokovic won WImbledon vs Roger Federer GOAT

A Wimbledon Final for the Ages

In what should only be referred to as epic, incredible, amazing, and awe-inspiring, Novak Djokovic won Wimbledon against tennis hero Roger Federer. For anyone who watched the match, this very well could be the greatest tennis match they have or will ever witness. Move aside Stranger Things. There’s a new talk in town!

It was two giants on the court, each refusing to surrender. Federer was at his best. His footwork and position was all-time and he utilized a serve-and-volley strategy to put Djokovic on his back heels. Djokovic, not to be outdone, was also on his game. Tirelessly extending points, placing the ball near the paint and displaying unmatched stamina.

Ultimately, there had to be a winner. And after 65 games and 3 tie-breakers, Novak Djokovic won Wimbledon and ousted legendary Roger Federer. He held his ground, defended his Grand Slam championship and won his fifth Wimbledon final. In winning this Grand Slam in such dramatic fashion against a legendary opponent, Novak further placed his name into the conversation for the tennis GOAT.

Djokovic Wins Wimbledon in Record Length

Novak Djokovic Wins Wimbledon Final in Record Length

As the last ball hit off of Federer’s racket, the final time of the match was an impressive 4 hours and 55 minutes long. This final broke Federer and Nadal’s 2008 Wimbledon record to become the longest Wimbledon final in men’s tennis history. Winning a classic like this is what truly exemplifies champions. The best of the best are able to grind out the longest and most difficult wins. When Novak Djokovic won Wimbledon yesterday, he showed that he has the stamina to outlast his opponent in the most extreme circumstances.

Holding off the Crowd and a Possessed Federer

Surprisingly, Novak Djokovic did not appear to be the better player for the majority of the match. Just counting games and not tie-breakers, Federer outnumbered Djokovic’s total 36 to 29. Federer also shifted his strategy to a serve-and-volley tactic and utilized his net positioning throughout the match. He forced Djokovic to pass or lob him. To his credit, Federer has a double match point in the 15th game. 40/15 against the World’s number-one ranked tennis player and the returning Wimbledon champion. However, due to both error on Federer’s part and impressive resilience by Djokovic, Djokovic rallied back and broke Federer’s serve.

Also difficult was the clear crowd advantage. It was not difficult to see that the noise of the Wimbledon audience was in favor of the 37-year-old legend, Roger Federer. Each point he won was met with raucous applause, while Djokovic was made to be the enemy. The crowd wanted Federer to win. Federer was on his game. He had the crowd. But still, Djokovic won Wimbledon.

Breaking Federer’s serve, winning three separate tie-breakers and ignoring the crowd noise cement’s Djokovic’s name in tennis history.

Record Against Nadal and Federer

Djokovic vs Federer in Cincinnati Masters 2015

Through 48 matches played, Novak Djokovic leads 26-22 against Roger Federer. In Grand Slams, like this 2019 Wimbledon Match), Djokovic leads 10-6. Even more impressive, in his five Grand Slam finals against Federer, Djokovic won four of them.

Additionally, Djokovic leads his rivalry against Rafael Nadal 28-26. Though Nadal edges Djokovic in their Grand Slam matches 9-6, they are 4-4 in Grand Slam finals.

Grand Slam Titles

Moreover, Djokovic is moving towards both Nadal’s and Federer’s Grand Slam totals. Nadal, in second, has 18 and Federer leads all men with 20. After Djokovic won Wimbledon yesterday, he moved his total up to 16. Since 2015, Djokovic has 9 Grand Slam championships.

He continues to display unbeatable stamina, beats the legends of the court, and shows that he can become the greatest tennis player of all time.

USWNT Win World Cup for the Fourth Time. Pay up US Soccer.

USWNT Win World Cup Against Netherlands

They did it again! It was spectacular watching another USWNT World Cup win. Megan Rapinoe was calm and collected and Rose Lavelle was sensational. This team and this nation’s women are the best at soccer.

The USWNT have four World Cup victories. But U.S. Soccer has dragged it’s feet in paying them what they deserve. Honestly, what more do they have to do to earn equal pay?

This Isn’t New. USWNT Win World Cup after World Cup

Unlike women’s soccer, the first men’s World Cup was in 1930. The USMNT had 21 opportunities since 1930 to qualify and play in World Cups. Still, they only qualified for ten World Cups. Since their third-place finish in 1930, their best finish is eighth. To call the USMNT lackluster is, to say the least.

Much different to the USMNT is the USWNT. Today, the USWNT won their fourth World Cup title, in just eight World Cups. It’s absolutely incredible. In 50-percent of Women’s World Cups, the USWNT walk away with the trophy. And this doesn’t even count the four Olympic Gold Medals the USWNT have. In just six Summer Olympics, they’ve won it all four times. So, in 14 Women’s World Cups and Summer Olympics, the US Women were victorious eight times. Eight times! Success like this is unheard of in any other sport.

Breaking Records Left and Right

Recall the 12 records and stats that displayed how truly amazing the USWNT is.

https://unafraidshow.com/12-uswnt-stats-womens-soccer-america-is-the-best/

That was before today’s USWNT World Cup win. Now, they’ve further extended and set even more records. This win marks 12 consecutive World Cup match wins, which surpasses the 2002-2006 Brazilian men. They also surpassed the 1999 USWNT and 2003 German women for most goals in a Women’s World Cup tournament. Wins, goals, appearances, titles. Whatever the category of success is, the USWNT is at the top.

Viewership and Revenue

Revenue is always the argument when people rationalize paying women less. Men just generate more financially, right? Wrong. That may have been the case prior to the 2015 World Cup Win, but it’s not anymore. Since then, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, “U.S. women’s games generated more total revenue than U.S. men’s games”. The USWNT stadium home kit is also Nike’s best online-selling jersey in a single-season.

Additionally, even before any number from the 2019 Women’s World Cup Final comes out, the 2015 Women’s World Cup Final already holds the record for the most-viewed soccer game in the U.S. So, let’s get this straight. They get the best views. Their views generate more income. And the USWNT are the top-selling national team, men’s or women’s.

Without a doubt, the USWNT deserve to be paid more than the USMNT. But, at a minimum, U.S. Soccer needs to pay them equally. It’s the justice they earned.

USWNT: 12 Stats that Prove Women’s Soccer is the Best in America

USWNT stats and records best in America FIFA World Cup Finals

Another USWNT World Cup Victory

Yet again, the USWNT won another World Cup final. These women are on fire. Breaking records left and right, fighting for equal pay, and even getting into beef with President Trump himself. Though many called them “classless“, “unsportsmanlike“, or worse, these incredible and strong women stood, unaffected. In their dominance, they’ve set themselves apart from the historic men and women’s World Cup teams. Now, more than ever, the U.S. women are proving that they deserve equal pay (if not more) to the U.S. Men’s National Team. Here are 12 USWNT stats and records that display how truly great American women are at soccer.

USWNT Stats and Records

Most Women’s World Cup Titles Won (4)

Even though the USWNT were already the leaders for Women’s World Cup titles, winning the 2019 Women’s World Cup further extended their record. In fact, with their 2019 Women’s World Cup victory, their title win-percentage is 50-percent. Eight tournaments, four championships. This team is unreal.

Most Consecutive World Cup Finals (3)

The USWNT now holds the record for most consecutive finals appearances. This USWNT stat is for both men and women’s World Cups.

Most Finishes in the Top 2 of a Women’s World Cup (5)

Since 1991, there have been eight Women’s World Cups. The USWNT appeared in 5 of those. That USWNT stat is 62.5-percent of World Cup finals for these all-stars.

Most Finishes in the Top 3 or 4 of a Women’s World Cup (8)

Unsurprisingly from those who watch the USWNT, they play well in each World Cup tournament. However, it is still incredibly impressive that they walk away with a medal every time. The lowest finish from the USWNT is third-place. They’ve finished third three times, second once, and first three times. No World Cup team, men or women’s, can say they’ve finished third or above in every World Cup played. Astounding.

Best Goal Differential in Women’s World Cups (+100)

Alex Morgan May19 USWNT and USWNT stats

Taking all USWNT World Cup matches, they scored 100 more goals than conceded. The record for men and women is currently held by Brazil with a plus-124 goal differential. Granted, the Brazil men’s team played in 21 World Cup tournaments, 13 more than the USWNT women.

Most World Cup Goals Scored (138)

Just like goal differential, this USWNT stat is only for Women’s World Cups. The Brazilian men’s team hold the record for most World Cup goals scored with 229.

Most World Cup Wins (40)

Again, the Brazilian men hold another record over the women. With 73 wins, the USWNT have a long way to go to top that. However, the USWNT average 1.5 wins more per tournament than the Brazilian men.

Most Tournaments Unbeaten in Women’s World Cup History (4)

With their victory on July 7th, this USWNT finished their fourth Women’s World Cup tournament unbeaten. So, in half of the Women’s World Cup tournaments, the U.S. women’s team walk out unbeaten. They are Goliaths.

Most Goals Scored in a World Cup Match (13) and Best Match Goal Differential (13)

Against Thailand, the U.S. women’s team rocked the world. Critics called them “classless” and “unsportsmanlike”, while fans rode the wave of success. This USWNT statistic set a record for both men and women’s tournaments.

Most Goals Score in Group Stage (18)

Obviously, the USWNT got a solid head start with their record-breaking win against Thailand. Winning 13 to 0 is quite the performance. With their two goals in the 2019 Women’s World Cup Final, they passed the 1999 USWNT and the 2003 German women for most goals in a Women’s World Cup tournament. They were also just one goal shy of tying the 1954 Hungarian men for most goals, men or women. So close.

Most Consecutive World Cup Match Wins (11)

With their win against England, the USWNT launched themselves over the top of Norway’s ten-game win record. This UWSNT stat is also tied with the 2002-2006 Brazilian men’s teams with 11 consecutive wins. But, winning the 2019 Women’s World Cup Final broke the record for either men or women. Let’s go!

The Best USWNT Statistic We’ve Found

Top Selling Nike Soccer Jersey

Reported by Tom VanHaaren of ESPN, the USWNT’s stadium home jersey just took the top-spot, for men or women, of Nike.com sales in one season. Additionally, online jersey retailer Fanatics also reported sales growth of more than 500-percent for the USWNT when compared through the same semi-final period in 2015. They are the top-selling national soccer team, men or women.

So let’s recap these USWNT statistics and records. The U.S. team is the most decorated women’s soccer team in history. They hold records over both men and women in incredibly impressive statistics. Remember, they also hold the record for the most watched soccer game in United States history. And now they also set records for jersey sales. It’s impossible to ignore their talent, hard work and success.

Pay. The. Women.

Is the Use of a World Cup VAR Ruining Soccer Forever?

FIFA Women's World Cup VAR

The World Cup VAR is the Main Focus of Controversy

Yet again the VAR (Video Assistant Referee) is the controversial topic of the day in this Women’s World Cup. And once again it also goes against the Nigeria Super Falcons. In today’s Germany vs Nigeria match, VAR was utilized twice in favor of Germany. Germany gained two early goals, one from a penalty kick. Nigeria fans, as any fan would, are extremely upset with the VAR. The World Cup VAR also helped reverse a handball penalty kick for Australia. Both Nigeria or Australia were eliminated in these matches. Because of these decisions, many are calling for its removal. But, is World Cup VAR really ruining the beloved game?

World Cup VAR Introduced in 2018

Although the VAR system still seems new, it was used at the last World Cup. The 2018 FIFA World Cup became the first installation of the Video Assistant Referee in World Cup matches. It immediately changed things. 29 penalty kicks were awarded, 13 more than the 2014 World Cup. Though it may seem like awarding 13 more penalties clearly disrupts play and destroys the integrity of the game, the opposite is true.

For nearly a century, soccer fans, coaches and athletes alike had to deal with poor referee decisions (or non-decisions) in World Cup matches.

Instead of pretending that we can have perfect referees, the VAR system actually deals with reality. Referees are fallible. They make mistakes. For that reason, the World Cup VAR allows reviews to four key mistake-prone areas:

  • Goals
  • Penalties
  • Direct red cards
  • Mistaken Identity

VAR Controversy at the 2019 Women’s World Cup

Stop-Motion

Lifelong fans of soccer continue to hammer on the fluidity of the game. Soccer is supposed to play in near-perpetual motion and the World Cup VAR changes that. This is completely true. There are times where the referee and VAR take minutes to review a missed-penalty. Players are standing and fans are waiting. This pain is completely understandable. The beauty of soccer is constant motion for 45 minutes.

Making Goalkeeping More Difficult

So far in the Women’s World Cup, three penalty kicks were retaken due to goalie encroachment. In each of the cases, the World Cup VAR aided in these decisions. As most soccer players and fans know, goalie encroachment has been treated similar to traveling in the NBA. Only the worst cases of encroachment are called. But, with recent law changes to FIFA just prior to the Women’s World Cup, the federation wanted to eliminate goalie encroachment at all costs. With the use of a VAR, super-slow motion makes even the slightest encroachment much bigger than it appears to the naked eye.

Additionally, the law requires that referees caution the goalkeeper. So, not only are the save/miss taken away, but they get a yellow card, too. Fortunately, FIFA decided to make a mid-tournament change to take away the yellow card stipulation. The World Cup VAR and retaking penalty kicks are already deterrent enough.

Growing Pains and Misguided Blame on the VAR

Melissa Borjas (referee) Women's World Cup VAR

As usual, fans are slow adapting to change and quick to anger. Changes to any sport come with controversy. Those new laws negatively impact teams when they are first introduced. That can be devastating to fans. Especially on the biggest stage in the world. But the World Cup VAR is not entirely to blame.

Remember that it is ultimately up to the head referee. The World Cup VAR can suggest moments to review or calls to overturn, but they do not make decisions from the booth. This should further illuminate the need for the video assist. Referees are not perfect and they will make mistakes. These mistakes are magnified on the global scale. Without the VAR, these errors would be unstoppable. Now, for the first years in soccer’s history, honesty and fairness can be upheld even when the referee initially misses it. It’s time to get over the growing pains and understand the blessing the VAR is now and for future generations of soccer.

USWNT vs Sweden: Why Did They Go for the Win?

USWNT vs Sweden FIFA World Cup

With a USWNT vs Sweden Win, They Draw Spain and France

In today’s 2-0 USWNT vs Sweden victory, the US women opted to take the path of most resistance. There was a lot of discussion surrounding tournament schemes and deliberately throwing the match. Because of the 2019 World Cup draw, the USWNT will face Spain in the round of 16 and most likely France in the quarterfinals. Just this January, both Spain and France were difficult opponents for the USWNT. In the two friendlies, the USWNT lost 3-1 to France and won 1-0 against Spain. Neither of those signify ease. While Spain can prove admirable, France is the team with best advantages against the USWNT. Not only is France host nation of the World Cup, it is arguably the best (or second-best) team in the tournament. Compounding those is the fact that France consistently gives the USWNT trouble. 

Recent France vs USWNT Results

The last time the USWNT beat France was in the 2016 SheBelieves Cup. Despite the victory, it was still only a 1-0 win and Hope Solo was in goal. Since then, France beat the USWNT 3-0 in the 2017 SheBelieves Cup, tied the USWNT 1-1 in the 2018 SheBelieves Cup and handily won 3-1 in a 2019 international friendly. Granted, Jill Ellis was experimenting during those years with different rosters and formations, but it doesn’t excuse the losses. France is a strong team with growing confidence and home-field advantage. That’s nothing to mess with.

The Path of 2012 Japan: Merit in Throwing a Match

With sports, merit and honor are always in question. Coaches and management are crucified for throwing games or seasons. But, doing so for positive results is worth considering. Rebuilding teams utilize their losing game-plan to trade away assets for picks, free up salary room, and acquire top picks in the draft. When teams commit to losing and rebuilding with analytical strategy, they experience resurgence. Just look at the Philadelphia Sixers or the Cleveland Browns. It’s unpopular during the escapade, but it works.

Norio Sasaki 2015
Norio Sasaki, 2015 Algarve Cup

Like this, attempting to lose or tie to draw a better tournament schedule is also a valid strategy. In the 2012 Olympics, Japanese coach Norio Sasaki largely changed his lineup against a weaker South Africa team. Then, he told his players to not push for a winning goal. Because of this, his players avoided a five-hour drive to Glasgow for the next match. Ultimately, the Japanese women advanced to the final match. So, there are certainly advantages to giving your team the easiest path to victory. If Jill Ellis instructed the women to lose in the USWNT vs Sweden match today, it wouldn’t be uncalled for.

Losing for Strategy Wasn’t Not an Option for the USWNT vs Sweden

Despite any consideration fans and analysts give losing for tactical advantage, there was no way the USWNT would do this on purpose. Players and coach alike, there was a multitude of reasons against this strategy.

USWNT vs Sweden Revenge Game

First off, these women are proud athletes. The largest stain on their campaign is the 2016 USWNT vs Sweden loss in the Rio Olympics. This loss marked the end of Hope Solo’s career and catapulted the USWNT into uncertainty. Obviously, athletes love to win. But more importantly, athletes and fans feed on rivalries and pride. They don’t want anyone to second guess them.

“We want to freaking play France.” “Fingers crossed obviously. But at the end of the day it’s, like, mind-boggling that people would think we would actually want to lose a game going into the knockout rounds. We want to continue those winning vibes.”

Crystal Dunn

“We don’t have any thoughts like that. We want to take each game — and win each game.”

Tobin Heath

“(Beating Sweden) is huge.” “It makes a huge impact on the world to see that we are not messing around, we are here to win. We are here to win every game, to score as many goals as we can to prove that we are the best team in the world. Each game is the biggest game of our lives. That’s how we are taking it [moving] forward.”

Ali Krieger

In today’s match against Sweden, the USWNT didn’t hesitate to score and erase that stain.

These Women are on Fire

Yes, there is a lot that Jill Ellis could do to stifle the USWNT. She controls the lineup, not the players. But, even if Jill Ellis wanted to stop the USWNT from scoring, this team is on fire. Stopping them, even with a different lineup, was an impossible challenge.

Against Thailand and Chile

  • 65 Shots (30 on Target)
  • 16 Goals
  • 8 Different Goal Scorers
  • Alex Morgan scored 5 goals in a Single Match 
  • Carli Lloyd Scored in 6 Consecutive World Cup Matches (2015 and 2019)
  • 3 Shots Allowed (2 on Target)
  • 75% Possession vs Thailand and 68% Possession vs Chile

Without a doubt, the USWNT is the team to beat right now. They broke records in their win against Thailand and didn’t tilt from the hate. Against Chile, even though they rested seven starters from the Thailand game, they still won handily. It gave Jill Ellis a chance to rest and test. Her stars got a break and her substitutes got playtime. Players like Carli Lloyd got to prove that they’ve got it and should be respected. Young and veteran alike, there were too many talented, scoring options for the USWNT vs Sweden.

The USWNT Doesn’t Show Fear

USWNT group photo (42878126761) (cropped)

Last, everyone needs to remember that this team despises fear. For goodness sake, Hope Solo lost her job because she called the Swedish team “cowards” for sitting back and playing defensively. Think the USWNT players would throw the match and allow anyone to call them cowards? Not a chance. 

Although many argued avoiding France early was the best strategy, it’s not in their playbook. Their best way to win this tournament is to never lose. Obviously. Just like NFL teams that go for it on fourth and two, the US women refuse to punt. Continuing to press into the attacking third and relentlessly strike the ball is the USWNT way. They are in incredible form right now, dangerous as ever. Relenting, even if it is for the “greater good” is not something they will or even can do. 

“I don’t think we would even understand how to play that game.”

Megan Rapinoe

USWNT vs Sweden Match Winners

Winners. These USWNT athletes are winners, through and through. They aren’t afraid to take the difficult path to victory, even if that means taking on France in the quarterfinals or taking on U.S. Soccer in a pay-equity lawsuit. If the USWNT want to win this tournament, they have to keep the gas-pedal to the floor. This isn’t a defensive team, tactically or mentally. They’re out for blood and don’t care who the opponent is. Whether it’s the USWNT vs Sweden or Spain or France, they continue to press and attack. They are fearless, talented warriors, ready for another title.

USWNT vs Thailand: Is the USWNT “Classless” or Unsportsmanlike?

USWNT vs Thailand FIFA Women's World Cup

USWNT vs Thailand: 13-0 and Unsportsmanlike

To everyone calling the USWNT unsportsmanlike after their recent 13-0 win, please stop. These women are warriors and this is their job. Winning, even if by the largest margin in World Cup history, is completely within their rights. It should be nothing but praised. Yes, it was the USWNT vs Thailand and not the USWNT vs France or Germany. Nonetheless, dominating at the international level is exactly what the USWNT need to do at this World Cup.

This is the World Cup

First off, this is the FIFA World Cup. It’s the world’s most prestigious sporting event, aside from the Olympics multi-sport compilation. For this reason alone, letting off the gas is not a concern. These are the world’s greatest athletes. It’s not the USWNT’s job to stop scoring. It’s the opposing defenses job to do that. Additionally, blowing out the other team is not unsportsmanlike. At all. This isn’t youth sports and it’s not an adult rec-league. There’s no need to keep things close to encourage the other team to keep playing. It’s not about fun, friends and having a good time. It may be a game to many, but this is their job. They are all professional soccer players. Their motivation already comes from pride, country and paycheck.

Celebrating Doesn’t Make the USWNT Classless

Even so, the celebrations looked “classless” to many. Why is it okay for Megan Rapinoe to celebrate after she scored the USWNT’s ninth goal?

Well, it’s okay because this is a tournament that happens once every four years. This is the FIFA World Cup! These women are playing for their country, in front of the most eyes women’s soccer ever receives. Most men and women never play in a World Cup, let alone score in one. For some of these athletes, this will be their only World Cup. They’ve worked tirelessly towards this tournament. It’s the pinnacle of their profession. So, celebrating a goal scored in the biggest moment of their lives should not be an issue.

Practice is Great. But In-Game Experience is Better, even a 13-0 USWNT vs Thailand Match

Additionally, that USWNT vs Thailand win was excellent for player form. Athletics are about form, rhythm and confidence. Practice can only do so much. In-game experience is completely different. Players have to find their top level quickly. Not adjusting from practice to the real deal is costly. At major tournaments, form and confidence swing like a pendulum. Teams catch fire or drop out. Even the best players in the world catch the “yips”. Jill Ellis and U.S. fans should be nothing but excited about seeing Alex Morgan and company at the top of their game. For goodness sake, seven different women scored a goal for the USWNT. 

  • Alex Morgan (5 goals)
  • Rose Lavelle (2 goals)
  • Lindsey Horan (1 goal)
  • Sam Mewis (2 goals)
  • Megan Rapinoe (1 goal)
  • Mallory Pugh (1 goal)
  • Carli Lloyd (1 goal)

In their spectacular victory, the USWNT set records for:

  • Goals scored in a World Cup match (men’s and women’s)
  • Largest margin of victory in a World Cup match (men’s and women’s)
  • Most individual goal scorers in a World Cup match (women’s)

Debuts and Veterans

Adding to that is Alex Morgan’s historic, five-goal scamper. With five goals, she tied the World Cup match record for individual goals scored. For a team with goalkeeping and defensive question marks, firing on all offensive cylinders is absolutely necessary. Especially considering how many young stars are in their first major tournament. Not only do these young stars get critical experience and minutes, they get to test their powers. Unlike Carli Lloyd, who continues to find the back of the net no matter her age or club form, Rose Lavelle, Lindsey Horan, Sam Mewis and Mallory Pugh scored their first ever World Cup Goals. Any anxiety about their first World Cup disappeared when that ball hit the back of the net. Not every game is going to be the USWNT vs Thailand. They are going to have more difficult opponents, so this win is good for rhythm and form.

This is Their Job

Also, it’s important to reemphasize that this sport is their profession. It’s not a hobby or a game. To them, it is their livelihood. In any other profession, winning big and celebrating is encouraged. America, perhaps more than any other country in the world, praises revenue and gains. Companies don’t discourage their salesman and saleswomen to share the market with their competitors. That would be ridiculous. Small business and corporation alike, increasing individual margins is a top goal. Change inevitably happens and successful people strike when the iron is hot. They utilize opportunity and advantage. In the same way, the USWNT are making the most of their time and talent. This World Cup is short and goal differentials become monumental tiebreakers. Scoring big helps the USWNT stay ahead and lock their eyes on one goal: win the 2019 FIFA World Cup.

USWNT vs. U.S. Soccer

Most importantly, the UWSNT are earning their paycheck. As discussed in a previous article, the USWNT are locked in a lawsuit against U.S. Soccer over pay equality. This victory adds fuel to the USWNT’s case. In the men’s last three World Cups (2006, 2010, 2014), they scored 12 goals combined. In just one victory, these women outscored that. Unlike the lackluster men, the U.S. women are as impressive as the Golden State Warriors or New England Patriots. With each highlight they create, they add audience, revenue and respect to women’s soccer. When they win, women’s soccer wins. Sports and pay are already stacked against female athletes. Instead of jeering them for celebrating victory, support them and assist their rise.

USWNT Midfield: 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup Roster Watch, Part 3

Reliance on Three USWNT Midfielders

Because of Jill Ellis’s 4-3-3 approach to the USWNT roster, the USWNT midfield is extremely important to success. While most teams control the center of the pitch with four midfielders, the U.S. women rely on three, key contributors. This lineup leans heavily on distributing the ball to striker and wingers, and aggressively pushing forward. With only three starters, Ellis chose to bring just six total midfielders. But, as said before with players like Crystal Dunn, many of the USWNT roster are very versatile. With that being said, here are the midfielders to keep an eye on in the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup.

USWNT Midfield Projected Starters

Lindsey Horan| Age: 25 | Caps: 68 | CM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnKNv8iUOMU

Lindsey Horan is without question the USWNT midfield’s biggest star. At just 25 years of age. Horan is an incredible talent and has the potential to become the best midfielder in the world.

While most of the U.S. women transitioned from high school to college to pro, Horan skipped college to play professionally. And who could blame her when she garnered a six-figure contract from Paris-Saint Germain. With this move, Horan instantly received experience playing against tough competition. She excelled. Horan scored 46 goals in 58 appearances with PSG before she transitioned back to the States.

In the NWSL, Horan became the best attacking, defending, and overall midfielder. She is the reigning NSWL MVP, obviously earned a spot on the 2018 NWSL Best XI, and was the NWSL Championship MVP in 2017. Horan has been elite in the NWSL, but her 2018 campaign was ridiculous.

On the NWSL official league leaders list, there are 31 different statistics for non-goalkeepers, excluding stats for yellow and red cards. Horan appears on 30 of those top-50 lists. Here are some highlights:

  • #1 in Total Touches (1,852)
  • 1st in Total Duels Won (297)
  • 1st in Aerial Duels Won (141)
  • 2nd in Dribbles Completed (46)
  • 2nd in Total Passes (1,293)
  • 3rd in Goals Scored (13)
  • 3rd in Headed Clearances (42)
  • 4th in Tackles Won (47)
  • 5th in Recoveries (218)
  • 6th in Shots on Target

Just entering her prime, Horan is primed for an international breakout in the 2019 Women’s World Cup. She is a dominant force in all facets of the game. Be ready to watch Horan win headers, make clutch tackles, beat her opponents on the dribble and strike long-shots with effortless power.

Julie Ertz| Age: 27 | Caps: 82 | DM

Seizing opportunities and rising to the occasion is what Julie Ertz does best. Leading up to the 2015 Women’s World Cup, Ertz replaced Crystal Dunn on the 23-woman USWNT roster. Not only did she replace Dunn, but Ertz started and played every minute of all seven World Cup games. Only her and four other U.S. women did that. From outside looking in to mainstay, Ertz cemented her name on the USWNT midfield.

In her club career, Ertz quickly earned praise on the Chicago Red Stars. After being drafted third overall in the 2014 NWSL College Draft, Ertz became the 2014 NWSL Rookie of the Year. In the following years with her team, she earned a spot on the 2015 NWSL Best XI and three spots on the NWSL Second XI (2016, 2017, 2018). She’s consistently been among the top of the league at the midfield position. 

Ertz hasn’t always played in the center of the pitch. In her first World Cup, she was a defender. But in 2017, in one of Jill Ellis’ many experiments, she moved Ertz to midfield. It was an incredibly successful move. Ellis became the USWNT Player of the Year in 2017 and is the hammer of the USWNT midfield. Combining defensive and midfield experience, intelligence and leadership, and an outright willingness to sacrifice her body created the most intimidating midfielder on the USWNT roster. She’s known for her aggressiveness. Ertz often recklessly forces her way into challenges and tackles. It’s earned her a reputation as an enforcer, never backing down from winning 50-50 balls in the middle of the field. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkvGDL8DBVU

She’s more than just a bruiser though. Ertz scored 31 goals in 79 collegiate appearances for the Santa Clara Broncos and she’s also shown capability of scoring professionally and internationally. She’s dangerous on set pieces, probably due to her outright carelessness for challenges. Ellis also encourages Ertz to push up field. Though she’s a defensive midfielder, she’s far less holding in Ellis’ ultra-attack system. Because of this, it can often lead to counterattacks. However, the style of play for the USWNT is to press forward, create opportunities and shoot as many times as necessary. They rarely sit back on their heels or park the bus. Ready your eyes for some wince-inducing tackles and pray that Ertz can stay healthy, even in her punishing play.

Rose Lavelle| Age: 24 | Caps: 27 | AM

Rose Lavelle (36648133634)

Rose Lavelle is a brilliant player to watch. Her collegiate play and highlight-reel footskills earned her the first overall pick in the 2017 NWSL College Draft. Lavelle was the Big Ten Midfielder of the Year in 2015 and 2016. Backheels, early through balls, and control at full pace are a few of her traits. On the ball, Lavelle is creative, talented and confident. She’s is dynamic and technically savvy.

That’s all great… if she can stay on the field. But she hasn’t been able to. In her first two seasons of NWSL action, Lavelle only played 21 total games, due to international-play injuries. She has torn her hamstring multiple times and has consistently been unreliable. Though she has 27 caps, Lavelle only played three, full-90 games for the USWMT. 

Certainly, Lavelle carries the injury-prone tag now. So why would Ellis choose to start her? It boils down to two reasons: attacking prowess and team chemistry. As noted above, Lavelle is a talented attacker, capable of creating her own opportunities. She brings a unique set of skills to the USWNT midfield. Also, Lavelle complement Horan and Ertz very well. Ertz is the holder and enforcer. Horan controls the team, both defensively and offensively. Everything goes through Horan. Lavelle, on the other hand, is almost strictly sought-out for her connection with Horan and her scoring ability. This skillset earned her three goals in five appearances in the 2018 CONCACAF Women’s Championship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tw2hcKNoz40

Clearly, Lavelle is a young, impressive footballer. Nonetheless, fitness and experience are a big deal. She is only 24 and this is her first World Cup. On top of that, Lavelle’s hamstrings are a big question mark. Starting a player that has only played three full-90 matches internationally is a bold move. The health of Lavelle’s hamstrings is incredibly important. 

USWNT Midfield Projected Bench

Samantha Mewis| Age: 26 | Caps: 50 | CM

Sam Mewis in March, 2019

Standing at five feet and eleven inches, Samantha Mewis is known by her teammates as the “Tower of Power”. Mewis is a great, all-around midfielder. She is known for skillful dribbling, excellent field position and a powerful leg. Mewis is a problem to opposing defenses and is always a danger to score from distance.

In the NWSL, Mewis is consistently near the top of the league. She was a finalist for NWSL Rookie of the Year in 2015, a finalist for the 2017 NWSL MVP and earned a spot on the NWSL Best XI in 2017. Mewis also showed up in big games. In the 2016 and 2018 playoffs, she scored goals in both semi-finals and the 2016 NWSL Championship game. 

Honestly, Mewis isn’t on the bench because of poor play, inconsistency or anything in her control. She’s sitting on the sideline because of Horan’s ascension and Lavelle/Ertz’s role-playing in Ellis’s 4-3-3 system. She’s a really good footballer, but lacks the chemistry and unique skillset needed to start for Ellis. With that being said, Mewis is a great replacement for Horan or Lavelle, if either misses time. Considering Lavelle’s injury history, Mewis could find playtime as early as the first match.

Allie Long | Age: 31 | Caps: 45 | DM

USWNT vs. Japan Allie Long (27420636701)

For the better part of the past year, due to a lingering knee injury and younger call-ups, Allie Long was on the roster bubble. Ellis was testing out different athletes for the USWNT midfield and she left Long out. But, in the final moments, Ellis chose experience. As was the case with Ali Krieger and Morgan Brian, Jill Ellis wanted the veterans that have been there before. She wants known quantities.

”World Cups aren’t moments to invest in players. World Cups are about winning.”

Jill Ellis

Long is a good depth play for Ellis. She’s played on NWSL teams with Alex Morgan, Tobin Heath, Lindsey Horan and Megan Rapinoe. Certainly, team chemistry is a good thing. Also, Long is a good backup to Ertz. Though she’s not nearly the punisher Ertz is, Long is a solid, holding midfielder. Long is consistent, maintains possession and can win tackles. She has experience in big tournaments and in different defensive/midfield positions.

Prior to her knee injury, Long was in excellent form. She earned spots on the NWSL Best XI in consecutive years (2015, 2016) and helped the Portland Thorns to one NWSL Shield (2016) and two NWSL Championships (2013, 2017). Now, with a fully healed knee (fingers crossed), Long is game-fit, reliable and ready for opportunity. 

Morgan Brian | Age: 26 | Caps: 86 | CM

Morgan Brian (37433224435)

When it comes to Morgan Brian, it is all about her health. Brian’s play hasn’t been the problem when she’s been fit. In the 2015 Women’s World Cup, Brian was instrumental in the USWNT’s win against China in the quarterfinals. She also played in six games, starting in four. In that tournament, she found her feet and ignited a spark into the USWNT midfield. Her growth and form continued into the 2016 Olympic run, where she earned the Golden Ball in the 2016 CONCACAF Women’s Olympic Qualifying Championship.

Brian is an impressive midfielder. She has the ability to win a tackle, instantly know where to pass the ball, and make a run for the connecting pass. Her soccer intelligence and instinct belong in tournaments like the 2019 World Cup.

Unfortunately, Brian hasn’t been fit for years. Brian’s suffered from some sort of injury each season since 2015. This series of injuries lingered and kept her off the pitch. Since 2017 began, Brian has only played 19 games. For a player with 86 caps to her name, that’s a major red flag. But, Jill Ellis saw that Brian started in her three NWSL games in 2019. Clearly that was enough to put trust in Brian. If Brian can recapture her form and fitness from years prior, she will excel as a substitute.

The USWNT Midfield Needs Luck

In this tournament, Ellis went with what she knows. She kept her core structure in Horan, Ertz and Lavelle. And she made sure that Long and Morgan made the squad. But Jill Ellis is banking on a healthy roster. Lavelle, Long, and Brian each carry significant injury risks. Additionally, Ertz’ reckless (though incredibly needed to aid the defense) puts her in danger of hitting the sideline. If the USWNT want to succeed, their stars absolutely have to stay on the pitch. Putting rose-colored glasses on won’t keep them free of injury. Yes, the USWNT have many players, both defenders and forwards, that are versatile enough to play in the midfield. But Ellis’ lack of true, midfield depth is alarming. All USWNT fans can do now is hope for the best.

Check out the USWNT Defense roster break down.

Check out the USWNT Goalkeeper roster break down.

USWNT Defense: 2019 Women’s World Cup Roster Watch, Part 2

USWNT defense Becky Sauerbrunn Tierna Davidson

Considering that the U.S. Women’s National Team’s starting goalkeeper, Alyssa Neaher, is getting her first World Cup playtime, the USWNT defense could not be more important. Here are those players.

USWNT Defense Projected Starters

Becky Sauerbrunn | Age: 33 | Caps: 157 | CB

Becky Sauerbrunn 2

Unlike many Ellis experiments, Becky Sauerbrunn is a consistent starter for the USWNT defense. Sauerbrunn is entering her third Women’s World Cup. She showed in 2015 that she was the top defender in the world. But, four years removed from playing every minute of the 2015 Women’s World Cup, does she still have it?

The short answer is, “Well, mostly yes.” Sauerbrunn has an elite and accomplished career in soccer. In college, she was the ACC Defensive Player of the Year. Her success followed her professionally. She was the NWSL Defender of the Year from 2013-2015. Then, in the 2015 World Cup, she helped the USWNT put together the most dominant, defensive campaign.

But, that was four years ago. Sauerbrunn is 33 years old now. However, she still has been exceptional. In the NWSL, she remains at the top, named to the NWSL Best XI six seasons in a row. Even though she is older and is not in her 2015 form, she is still a great player. Think of her 2019 World Cup like Carles Puyol’s 2010 World Cup. In the twilight of her career, watch for strong use of intelligence, timing and position.

Abby Dahlkemper | Age: 26 | Caps: 39 | CB

Abby Dahlkemper (36792787913) (cropped)

Unlike her counterpart Sauerbrunn, Abby Dahlkemper is just coming into her own.

In college, Dalhkemper was a player that UCLA could count on, starting 92 of 93 games in four seasons. Dahlkemper racked up starts and earned a finalist spot for the MAX Hermann Trophy (first defender in 10 years to do so). Her collegiate play garnered the third-overall selection in the 2015 NWSL College Draft. Since her draft, she quickly rose the ranks of defenders. Dahlkemper aided the Flash to an NWSL Championship in 2016, the NC Courage to the 2017 Shield, 2018 Shield and 2018 NWSL Championship.

Dahlkemper is still known for always being counted on. She played every minute, including playoff games, in the 2016 and 2017 seasons. At just 24 years of age, Dahlkemper received the title “NWSL Defender of the Year”. She subsequently earned a spot on the NWSL Best XI in 2017 and 2018. Professionally, Dahlkemper is at the top of her game.

But, despite Dahlkemper’s success in the NWSL, she looked average on the USWNT. This is most likely due to the lack of support and aggressive nature of the U.S. Women’s National Team. Ellis’ coaching style dictates the players and schemes surrounding Dahlkemper and Sauerbrunn. Because of this, Dahlkemper is asked to do more for the USWNT defense than professionally. Nonetheless, Dahlkemper is a powerful, savvy and elite defender. It’s time for her to show up on the world stage.

Crystal Dunn | Age: 26 | Caps: 85 | LB

Crystal Dunn June2018

Crystal Dunn’s left-back position for the USWNT defense is a clear picture of Jill Ellis’ coaching style. Dunn, though she has been a solid and regular defensive contributor for the US Women’s National Team in recent years, is actually an exceptional winger or attacking midfielder. At the University of North Carolina, Dunn led the team in points with 31 goals and 25 assists in 80 games. After being drafted first overall in the 2014 NWSL Draft by the Washington Spirit, Dunn emerged onto the scene in 2015. Her 15 goals earned her the Golden Boot, the NWSL MVP, and set a new NWSL record for goals per team game (0.75). Dunn also has 24 international goals and the 2016 CONCACAF Women’s Olympic Qualifying Tournament Golden Boot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rdcC93Y4zo

But, instead of playing as a winger, Ellis is forcing Dunn to guard the elite wingers of the world. It displays the lack of defensive depth, abundance of natural attackers, and overall attitude of Ellis. Luckily, Dunn has shown competence and quality as a defender ever since college. She was the ACC Offensive Player of the Year and ACC Defensive Player of the Year during college. Granted, it’s not her natural position, but she can still be a good left back. Keep fingers crossed that Dunn can hold against the best wingers of the world.

Kelley O’Hara | Age: 30 | Caps: 117 | RB

Kelley O'Hara (37041823640)

Like Dunn, O’Hara is another all-around player. She transitioned from playing forward for her entire collegiate career to play outside back for the USWNT defense. Ellis loves versatility.

Fortunately for the defense, O’Hara is participating in her third World Cup. Though she was a spot-starter in World Cup games, she played well. O’Hara is a good one-on-one defender out wide and fits the teams need for good defenders.

But, there is a major, glaring issue. O’Hara might not be healthy. She underwent ankle surgery in October and is still battling this ongoing ankle injury. The USWNT can’t afford to lose a starter or have a depleted lineup. O’Hara’s ankle has to hold up.

USWNT Defense Projected Bench

Emily Sonnett | Age: 25 | Caps: 32 | CB/RB

Emily Sonnett (cropped)

Sonnett, in her young career, is a great defensive player. She was the ACC Defensive Player of the Year in 2015, taken first overall in the 2016 NWSL Draft by the Portland Thorns and played every minute of her 15 rookie games. In 2018, she claimed her position on the NWSL Best XI and the 2019 USWNT World Cup roster.

This will be Sonnett’s first World Cup and the USWNT defense might need her. In the Tournament of Nations, Emily Sonnett started in place of the injured Kelley O’Hara. If O’Hara misses time again, Sonnett is a serviceable backup and should (though Ellis loves her veterans) play ahead of Ali Krieger.

Ali Krieger | Age: 34 | Caps: 100 | FB

Ali Krieger

Ali Krieger was a great player.

Krieger was part of Fox Soccer’s Best Eleven of the FIFA Women’s World Cup in 2011, NWSL Best XI in 2014 and 2017, and FIFA FIFPRO World XI in 2016. She helped FCC Frankfurt to multiple championships in 2008 and 2011 in the Frauen DFB-Pokal, Fussball-Bundesliga and UEFA Champions leagues. She was great.

Was.

Krieger is not in the same form as her younger self. She’s not the 2015 Women’s World Cup star. The USWNT operated without her from August, 2017 to March, 2019. Then, on the doorstep of the 2019 Women’s World Cup, Ellis called on her beloved veteran once again.

“Ali has never been off the radar,” Ellis told reporters when asked about Krieger last month. “Sometimes the experience piece is something you have to take into consideration going into a massive event like [the World Cup].”

Jill Ellis

Ellis values experience and wanted as many pieces of her 2015 World Cup championship as possible. But, even though Krieger is a true fullback and provides needed depth and experience, her fitness and form are questionable. It could be disastrous if Ellis turns to Krieger instead of Sonnett or Davidson when needed. Krieger is a big risk heading into this tournament.

Tierna Davidson | Age: 20 | Caps: 20 | CB

Tierna Davidson postmatch vs China (43632430461) (cropped)

Tierna Davidson could very well be the USWNT’s best defender soon, but she is green. Davidson is only 20 years old. She played only two professional games so far in her career and only has 19 caps. She’s so young and lacks experience.

Nonetheless, Davidson is a gifted defender. Davidson was the 2017 College Cup Most Outstanding Defensive Player, a 2017 MAC Hermann Trophy semifinalist, the Pac-12 Defensive Player of the Year, All-America First Team, U.S. Soccer’s 2018 Young Female Player of the year, and the No. 1 overall pick in the 2019 NWSL College Draft. Davidson is good.

She’s fast, agile and more physically impressive than the other starters. On a vulnerable 4-3-3, Davidson can make up ground on counter attacks. But then again, she is inexperienced. Davidson, at this point in her career, is unfortunately just a depth move.

Can the USWNT Defense Hold?

All signs of Jill Ellis’ coaching point to an addiction. Ellis is addicted to attacking power. Aside from operating in a 4-3-3 scheme, Ellis encourages midfielders to aggressively push up and also put Crystal Dunn, a talented winger, at left back. The USWNT has one game-plan: score.

This game-plan cost the U.S. in the 2016 Rio Games. Granted, the U.S. took 26 shots in their 1-1 draw/penalty loss to Sweden, but it exposed the USWNT. Teams can park the bus and counterattack. All they need to do is make one steal and two passes to get into scoring position. When Hope Solo was in goal with a strong, defensive supporting cast, this wasn’t as much of a problem. They could afford to do this.

This year is different. The USWNT staff failed to develop a defense around Alyssa Naeher. They refused to put trust in Arin Wright (Gilliland), Megan Oyster and Casey Short. Instead, Ellis and staff chose to put attackers in defenders clothes and to chose World Cup experience over current form. Because of this, the USWNT defense is porous and susceptible to scoring opportunities. USWNT fans need to hope for healthy legs and a healthy lead.

Check out the USWNT Goal keepers.